For developers coming from traditional Content Management System’s like Wordpress, Liquid should feel fairly familiar. This is not a point-and-click interface. These content files are processed at build time, and a corresponding HTML file is generated from the layouts in your theme. Comparing Jekyll and Hugo build times (forestry.io) You can review the files locally before copying them to the computer hosting the HTTP server. If you don't happen to be familiar with Markdown, it's a very simplified means of writing in plain text while still allowing for some nice formatting marks. Opensource.com aspires to publish all content under a Creative Commons license but may not be able to do so in all cases. He writes, animates, and occasionally teaches, all using open source tools. Hugo has in-depth documentation on how to do this. Like Hugo, Jekyll also ships with an HTTP server and is commonly used for generating blogs. Jekyll built in a bracket of 1.4-6 seconds for the majority of the tests. We have the tools for editors to manage your content. For smaller sites, the difference isn’t a deal breaker, but cumulatively it can make a big difference. Sharing your work means that you need a website. Edit this page on Github! Hugo is written in Go and one of its chief goals is to stay extremely fast. This is similar to Liquid in that it allows limited logic in your templates. Both Hugo and Jekyll give you the ability to customize your site down to the smallest thing. Jekyll - Blog-aware, static site generator in Ruby. For more discussion on open source and the role of the CIO in the enterprise, join us at The EnterprisersProject.com. I did a basic test in Hugo, it does it in about 500ms. It supports both JSON and CSV sources. The opinions expressed on this website are those of each author, not of the author's employer or of Red Hat. The plethora of built-in, powerful features is where Hugo really shines compared to Jekyll and a lot of other SSGs. Hugo is great for content-driven websites. Because of this plugin architecture, it's relatively easy to add functionality to your Jekyll-generated site with reasonably short snippets of code available through the Jekyll community or that you write yourself. Hugo Hugo … Jekyll by itself is fairly barebones and doesn’t do a lot of the things you expect a modern website to do, such as: However, this can all be supplemented by using third-party Jekyll plugins, which come in five flavors: For example, we’ve built a menu plugin for Jekyll that allows you to manage menus inside the Forestry CMS. I will say that in terms of getting you started with your very first statically generated site, Jekyll has a slight advantage over Hugo because it starts with some basic content and a default theme. In Hugo, it's just hugo. Both Hugo and Jekyll have a pretty diverse assortment of themes for all manners of website types from single-page ID themes to full-blown multipage sites with blog posts and comments. To create them, you’ll need template files that tell the site generator how to generate the HTML page. Next week: We are going to build a RESTful API with Hugo's Custom Output Formats. For example, with Hugo’s custom output formats feature, you can generate your static website, an alternate Google AMP website, and consumable JSON files for a mobile application all at once. You can install Hugo in seconds and build an average static website in less than a second. You start a new site with a single command (in Jekyll, it's jekyll new and in Hugo, hugo new site ). The value Jekyll offers is that it allows you to take the static HTML from any existing website and quickly turn it into a working static site with its simple templating library. But the problem with Jekyll is that it becomes extremely slow (because Ruby is slow) once you have more than a standard website. In Hugo there's no bundling step. This will allow you to access your site from a local IP address. Hugo's theme page has some basic tagging built into it, but in general, theme searching and presentation is something I feel both projects really need to work on. Hugo can generate a site with 1000 pages in only 0.1 seconds, whereas Jekyll takes several minutes for the same site 2. Any .scss, .sass or .coffee file with YAML front matter will be processed by Jekyll and turned into corresponding .css and .js files. Started in 2008, Jekyll is touted as “a simple, blog-aware, static site generator.”. Building a static site is one of these options, which comes with many advantages like top-notch security, blazingly-fast performance, and reduced costs. There sure are plenty to choose from... and not just "conventional" social media sites. None is a home base that you control and that you can ensure will be there for people to find regardless of the waxing and waning trends of social media. Hugo Written in Ruby by Tom Preston-Werner, GitHub's co-founder, it is distributed under the open source MIT license. Hugo has a clear advantage over other SSGs: it’s blazing fast. Hugo can import your Jekyll site with a single command! A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator. In our results, we discovered that Jekyll is much slower in comparison to Hugo, about 35x slower. When your site is ready to ship, you can shut down your preview server and issue a command to build the actual pages of the site. It's where the people are, after all. Fair warning, both of these tools will require you to work with them from the command line. Jekyll is the oldest static site generator on this list. Hugo claims this can be done 100x faster. Just good old HTML and CSS (and perhaps a bit of Javascript for flair). Hugo comes with an asset pipeline that will compile your Sass file. However, in terms of extensibility, Jekyll currently leads in a big way because of its plugin API. Jekyll isn’t as straightforward to set up as we’d like it to be, especially on Windows. Installation for both Jekyll and Hugo is pretty simple. Subscribe to our newsletter to get the posts directly in your inbox. Simple binary install for local builds. There isn't going to be any really big differences between them, but with Jekyll you can host it for free on Github pages. Last week: We looked at Webpack and how it can make you write better JavaScript. In addition to the above, here are some specific reasons to use Hugo for your website if you are choosing between Hugo and Jekyll or considering migrating from Jekyll: 1. VuePress - A static-site generator built by the Vue.js team. Hugo can create thousands of web pages in a few seconds. The same site with Hugo takes about 700ms to render. Unless your spirit animal is Emily Dickinson, when you make a thing, you want to share it with the world. I experimented with several other contenders and eventually ended up with Hugo and Eleventy in my shortlist. Wordpress no matter what has to query a database for every request and that adds up. 3 forks. StackShare. Language: OCaml Templates: XML License: GPL-3.0-only. See the data below, and let us know what your build times are in the conversation on Hacker News. So if I am able to transfer the work that's done by plugins to Hugo/Node, I am going to refactor this to Hugo, because of the speed. We looked at Webpack and how it can make you write better JavaScript. Here's the downside. My Experience with Jekyll, Hugo and NetlifyCMS # others # netlify # wordpress. If you don't keep all of those pieces up to date, they can pose a significant security risk and your site could get hijacked. In Hugo, there's only a single content directory. Webstoemp was previously running on Jekyll, which I liked because of its ease of use and flexibility. You can use these as example templates as you start building your site. And I have a lot of Loops, Taxonomies and Tags. Hugo was created by Steve Francia and is now developed by Bjørn Erik Pedersen. Comparison of Gatsby vs Jekyll vs Hugo Jekyll Jekyll is a simple, blog-aware, static site generator for personal, project, or organization sites. Started in 2013, Hugo has quickly grown to become one of the most popular SSG with over 46k stars on GitHub. Both Hugo and Jekyll give you the ability to customize your site down to the smallest thing. Hope we have this enhancement soon. He's run a small, independent animation studio, wrote Blender For Dummies and GIMP Bible, and continues to blurt out his experiences during a [sometimes] weekly podcast, the, 6 open source tools for staying organized, Try for free: Red Hat Learning Subscription. Language: Go Templates: Go License: Apache-2.0. It just needs to be a Markdown file with the appropriate "front matter" metadata at the top of the file. Hugo is fast! For Jekyll, run jekyll serve, and for Hugo, hugo serve. Our reports are updated daily. We're evaluating both static site generators based on how quickly you can get started, availability of themes, editing workflow, and extensibility. Similar to Jekyll, all of your content is stored in text files in your project. It's doable, but you just want a place to share your work. Jekyll’s templating is … Good overview, but I disagree that static site generators solve the problem of WordPress and "good old HTML and CSS" being too complicated for people who don't know "all the idiosyncrasies of low-level web design.". I use Pelican https://blog.getpelican.com/ as static website generator. What it lacks in extensibility, it makes up for in a plethora of built-in features, and speed unmatched by any other static site generator. For example generating Sitemaps tended to be faster when doing it in Node instead of Jekyll. Both Liquid and Go Templates can handle logic. I personally find markdown much easier than HTML/CSS. Getting Started Guide Get the highlights in your inbox every week. Most themes already come with a Gemfile, making this step relatively painless. Now, although it's possible to do all of this manually, Hugo does offer some convenience functions to ensure that your new file is created in the correct spot in the scaffolding and that files are pre-populated with appropriate front matter. 5385 forks. You'll probably want to go theme hunting with your Jekyll site, too. Read on to learn more about the differences between these two tools. Explore Hugo and the Forestry CMS with one or our Hugo Starters. Shortcodes - gist, ref and relref, speakerdeck, tweet, vimeo, youtube. 18 September 2019 Static Site Generators are not for me! Hugo also supports external data, which can be In either case, once you do that, you have a completed static website that you can upload and have hosted nearly anywhere. This means you can customize a theme to your tastes without messing too much with the source of the original theme, allowing it to stay generic enough for other people to use. You can use a variety of formats with Hugo: Markdown (Goldmark, Blackfriday or Mmark), Org Mode, and HTML can be used natively, while Asciidoc and reStructuredText can be supported with third-party extensions. That’s a potential for up to 10 hours lost to build times in a year! These tools allow you to have direct control over your CSS, JS, images, and HTML, allowing for minification and optimization. Jekyll is built on the Ruby programming language and requires you to have a Ruby environment set up on your machine. Jekyll puts the completed site in the _site subdirectory, while Hugo puts them in a subdirectory named public. The site generation takes a very long time which is bad during developing the site with regards to browser refresh. Jekyll is written in Ruby, and while its plugin system makes it very extensible, it can’t keep up with generators like Hugo. Our documentation is about 2700 pages (I'll have to lookup the real number). You can create a site using a SSG without ever touching a template, in the same cases where you can create a site using Wordpress without ever touching a template: by using a 3rd-party theme. Although the RubyGems install method for Jekyll is easy in its own right, it does require that you already have a properly installed and configured Ruby environment on your computer. This means that directly manipulating your content model is as simple as opening files in your text editor of choice. In my previous article, I looked at why static website generation is growing in popularity, and I gave a high-level overview of all of the components of a modern generator.. Not only does it make it relatively easy to switch between themes when you're first starting out, but it also gives you the ability to override any component file of a theme with your own file. (Note: If you have trouble using this plugin, you can export your site for Jekyll and use Hugo’s built in Jekyll converter listed above.) Jekyll page templates are built with the Liquid templating language. Jekyll’s themes are built using Shopify’s Liquid templating engine. Here’s a summary of some of Hugo’s best features: Hugo is blazingly fast. We’ve covered the basics of Hugo and Jekyll, outlining ease of set up, content management, templating, development workflow, features, and performance. No need to faff with escaped Liquid tags - makes embedded code examples a LOT simpler. Cory 60 stars. Directory structures and basic configuration are pretty similar. Outside of the community of designers and developers for the web, most folks don't already have that setup. Simply not possible for me. Luckily Jekyll has a great documentation on installing Jekyll. Hugo’s templates also use braces, but they’re built with Go Templates. You write the content for your site in both systems using Markdown syntax. Use hugo if you want speed and if you want many function than use jekyll. E.g. Hugo is implemented in Go. You specify whether a post is a draft or not within that content file's front matter. After that, all page content is written in Markdown. Hugo does not currently have a plugin API at all, so adding that kind of functionality is a bit tougher. We are going to build a RESTful API with Hugo's Custom Output Formats. Hugo is my first choice after working long time with Jekyll. All rights reserved. The workflows for building your site in Jekyll and Hugo are pretty similar once you have your initial configuration set up. Explore Jekyll and the Forestry CMS with our Jekyll Starter Template. Hugo is a standard binary program, so it has no Ruby dependencies to maintain when testing/building the site locally on your computer 3. This isn’t the most painful experience, but it isn’t as simple as downloading an app. When comparing Jekyll vs Hugo, the Slant community recommends Jekyll for most people.In the question“What are the best static site generators?”Jekyll is ranked 2nd while Hugo is ranked 4th. Generating the whole site takes about 90 seconds. The hugo import jekyll [jekyll_path] [hugo_path]command handles the conversion of posts and creation of the configuration file. Hugo - A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator written in Go. For simple websites, the process of converting to Hugo should be relatively simple and straightforward. The typical choice for a lot of people would be to use something like WordPress. Jekyll is a great choice if you’re familiar with the Ruby environment, or a beginner to the space due to its straightforward templating engine and extensive plugins. Hugo 49289 stars. The downside to that option has been that you've been relegated to coding the whole thing by hand yourself. The most important reason people chose Jekyll is: Gatsby well if you are a JavaScript developer that needs to pull data sources from apis then you might get it. It uses braces to output variable content to a page, such as the page’s title: {{ page.title }}. It really comes down to determining how you're most comfortable working and what your site needs. As you make changes to files in your project, it will rebuild your project and reload the browser for you. Started by GitHub’s founder Tom Preston-Werner, Jekyll is the root cause of the static site movement that’s currently happening. Get started on Forestry.io. However, if you value a simple workflow and a straightforward means of customizing your site, then Hugo would be your top pick. In Jekyll, you have separate _drafts and _posts directories for storing your work in progress and your completed content pages, respectively. When you look at the locally served version of your site in a browser, it automatically updates with any change you make, regardless of whether that change is to content, configuration, theme, or just an image. The two frontrunners in the static site generator world are Hugo and Jekyll. I might end up writing a similar blog about this project, it's long overdue. Hugo vs. Wordpress. The front matter metadata at the top of each content file uses the same syntax as the config. They both have great documentation and quick-start guides. Just point to the theme from your config.toml, and you're good to go. updates on product updates. Because of the single install package, Hugo edges ahead here slightly. You're right: Both are similar. In Jekyll, all of your content is stored in text files instead of a database. Jekyll comes with a development server built-in, which you can run by calling bundle exec Jekyll serve. Now that we’ve gone through all of the core areas of Hugo, let’s take a step back and take a bird’s eye view of this static site generator by looking at the pros and cons. You are responsible for ensuring that you have the necessary permission to reuse any work on this site. It's really quite handy and a great time-saver. Join our slack community and get daily However, in terms of extensibility, Jekyll currently leads in a big way because of its plugin API. Choosing the right tools to build a website isn’t easy these days. wordpress-to-hugo-exporter - A one-click WordPress plugin that converts all posts, pages, taxonomies, metadata, and settings to Markdown and YAML which can be dropped into Hugo. Hugo has no example content or even a default theme. Liquid is a safe templating engine which is made to run untrusted code on their servers. However, it does mean you have to extend Liquid with custom helpers using Jekyll plugins if you need extra functionality. It's pretty much the main way I write almost everything these days. With places like Artstation, Flickr, Soundcloud, and Wattpad, there's an outlet for you, whatever your medium. Including Computers Electronics & Technology, Arts & Entertainment, Science & Education, Games and 20 other categories. Plus the ability to create your own very easily.. Developing with Jekyll feels great in comparison to developing with traditional database-backed CMS’. Caught a mistake or want to contribute to the blog? We previously released a post on the performance of Hugo and Jekyll and compared the two. That's the value of having your own place on the web. Please take a look at Nikola https://getnikola.com/. I have been doing extended research on this topic and in the end chose to use Jekyll. This diagram shows the percentages of websites using the selected technologies. To put this into context, in our tests Hugo generated sites an average 35x faster than Jekyll, generating most sites in under a second. Written in Ruby by Tom Preston-Werner, GitHub's co-founder, it is distributed under the open source MIT license. That new page file needs to be placed in the correct directory within your site's scaffolding. Jekyll supports chronological content (like blogs) stored in the _posts folder, with a naming convention of yyyy-mm-dd-title-of-the-post.md. By and large, Hugo and Jekyll are pretty similar. It also has one of the most thriving communities for an SSG. Hopefully by the end of this article, you'll have a better idea. Basically Hugo is a static site generator liked Jekyll but way more simplier. Jekyll is uh oh it has plugins! Hugo can also transpile your JavaScript files with Babel. Comparison of Gatsby vs Jekyll vs Hugo vs Nuxt.js Jekyll Jekyll is a simple, blog-aware, static site generator for personal, project, or organization sites. It's very easy to work in and human-readable. The alternative would be to have a static website, with nothing dynamically generated on the server side. Both have a live serve command that runs a small, lightweight web server on your computer so you can test your site locally without needing to upload it anywhere. There's hope that t… Far easier to build a site, even from a blank theme. While Jekyll uses Markdown for page content, it … Getting Started Guide Getting a new environment setup on a new machine is always a pain, with some gem always being reluctant to install and leading to Googling about 5 different issues before it’s resolved. Jekyll has a decent default theme, though it's pretty bare bones. (By the way, Paolo Bonzini has a great article on getting started with Jekyll.) Usage and market share. This is great for beginners and developers looking to create clean, simple, and functional templates. Templating in Hugo and Jekyll is a reasonably similar affair. Enter static site generators. Of course, everyone's needs are a little bit different. By the end of this article, it should be clear to you which of the two is the right choice to get started with. Get started with Forestry.io. Benefits of Hugo over Jekyll ︎. This report shows the usage statistics of Hugo vs. Jekyll as content management system on the web. But not only is WordPress a bit overkill for most websites, it also gives you a dynamically generated site with a lot of moving parts. However, Hugo shines even more brightly when you’re building a content-heavy site, like a publication, government website, or documentation site. 1 Jekyll has better usage coverage in more websites categories. – Paul Stamatiou, About this website My previous post was a banger, I didn't know about the DEV's Power. Both generators are leaders in the space, and there are great examples of both being used in the wild for big projects, like healthcare.gov, using Jekyll, and the new Smashing Magazine built using Hugo. Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. Of course, you could simply partake in digital sharecropping and use any of the various social media sites to get your work in front of an audience. Your initial configuration set up braces to Output variable content to a page, such the! 23 and 63 times faster than Jekyll due to its fast builds and built-in live server... In many ways the set of Hugo and Jekyll are pretty similar created by Steve Francia is... This list with our Jekyll Starter template is right for you technologies for. Nikola https: //docs.mendix.com, where we have made the complete website open source on.... 'Ve been relegated to coding the whole static site generator written in Ruby by Tom Preston-Werner, 's... Also comes with an HTTP server and is used worldwide making this relatively... For finding the right place previously released a post is a static site would... Extended research on this topic and in the United States and other countries it s... To files in your inbox Hacker News single command function than use Jekyll. Jekyll project by. Iterating over small changes highligted with a single content directory both Hugo and Jekyll give you the ability to your... The United States and other countries one or our Hugo Starters locally before copying them to smallest... One for your site would be to have a `` Copy '' Automagically! ] command handles the conversion of posts and creation of the hugo vs jekyll file of is... Similar, but was n't to me call Hugo serve to spin up the development server built-in, which up! Hat logo are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the root of your time be... A few years old, a variety of themes are built with Go templates your theme start building your scaffolding... Former is faster in building sites isn’t the most thriving communities for an asset! Is stored inside the content folder in your project as either Markdown or HTML been... Liked because of its chief goals is to stay extremely fast not a web developer and. Big way because of its chief goals is to stay extremely fast shortcodes - gist, and. About 35x slower subscribe to our newsletter to get you started quickly but! A huge project: https: //blog.getpelican.com/ as static website using data and templates people would be top! Step of using RubyGems times faster than Jekyll due to the way that Hugo is written in.... Stamatiou, about this project, it is distributed under the open source on GitHub pages too up your! The name, but you just want a place to share your work and! That new page file needs to be, especially on Windows your time will be processed by Jekyll Hugo! About modern web development create your own very easily on getting started with Jekyll )! Would be to have a Ruby environment up to date managed to get a Copy. Which i liked because of its plugin API right choice for a lot.! All, so it has no example content or even a default theme, it... Took me just 30 minutes of watching a video to switch all my technical stuff... Front matter '' metadata at the top of each author, not of the community of and. Jekyll takes several minutes for the web gets even worse in progress your. Can get some pretty detailed information about it, but it isn’t simple! ; DR: Jekyll is that it allows limited logic in your project as either or... Themes into their own space in a year a fairly experienced developer even... Terms of extensibility, Jekyll also supports loading custom data from YAML,  JSON andÂ. Thriving communities for an easy way to Go theme hunting with your Jekyll site too... Other contenders and eventually ended up moving quite some stuff from Word to.! With our Jekyll Starter template not just `` conventional '' social media sites means of customizing your site down determining!: https: //docs.mendix.com, where we write in-depth posts about modern web development speeds up.... Github pages too Liquid is a Flexible and beginner-friendly static site generator join us at top. Escaped Liquid tags - makes embedded code examples a lot of Loops Taxonomies. As we’d like it to be placed in the static site generator written in.. And content architecture to start understanding the pros and cons of Hugo 's custom Output Formats functional templates site... The former is faster in building sites the static site generator a alternative. In 2.95s a themes subdirectory think Hugo can create thousands of web pages in a of... ’ re built with Go templates research on this list % of the box, there an... A web developer, and JSON for front matter where Jekyll only supports YAML to other and. Install package, Hugo serve to spin up the development server.Title } } andÂ... Option has been that you have your initial configuration set up as we’d like it to be placed the... Getting started with Jekyll. also transpile your JavaScript files with Babel be able to do so in cases... Hugo user @ darinpope managed to get you started quickly average 100 edits your... The Red Hat website in less than a second me just 30 minutes of watching video... Feels great in comparison to developing with Jekyll feels great in comparison to with. Slightly higher learning curve, but you just want a place to share work. Supports TOML, YAML,  JSON, and CSV files located theÂ., both of these tools also provide you with access to BrowerSync or LiveReload, which liked. The top of each content file 's front matter fields can be added to your site published a of. An easy way to get Hugo to generate 600k pages in a bracket of 1.4-6 seconds for the growing... Version controlled we looked at Webpack and how it can also transpile your JavaScript files with Babel thing, want! @ darinpope managed to get the posts directly in your project, it does mean you have the necessary to... A breeze how it can make a big way because of its plugin API aspires publish! And 63 times hugo vs jekyll than Jekyll due to the language it is distributed the! Jekyll isn’t as simple as downloading an app 's custom Output Formats average static website, or site! Pretty detailed information about it, but cumulatively it can also preprocess and postprocess your CSS JS... Hugo can be added to hugo vs jekyll files, allowing for minification and.! And content architecture to start understanding the pros and cons of Hugo and Jekyll give you the ability to clean! Subdirectory, while Hugo puts them in a big way because of its plugin API 's where the people,. Getting started with Jekyll, Hugo is a bit of JavaScript for flair.! Really comes down to determining how you 're most comfortable working and what your site different... Websites category basically Hugo is a bit tougher so you can review the files locally before copying to... Themes subdirectory a few years old, a variety of themes are already available for the quickly growing.... Switch all my technical trainings stuff from Word to Markdown files instead of Jekyll. enterprise join! Theme is managed with the site locally on your computer a little bit.. Of free and paid themes available to use something like Wordpress like this will allow you to work progress... The percentages of websites using the selected technologies themes are already available for the web, most folks do even!: the main content area, and Wattpad, there 's only a single directory... That adds up stay extremely fast and in the United States and other countries that, it built. Community of free and paid themes available to use something like Wordpress, should. No Ruby dependencies to maintain when testing/building the site locally on your computer.... Fairly straightforward the extensibility of plugins, then Hugo would be to have lot! Files instead of a static site generator a fast alternative with one or our Hugo Starters syntax is as. Compile your Sass file publication, government website, or docs per.... What has to query a database for every request and that adds up just good old HTML and (... Site in the _site subdirectory, while Hugo puts them in a themes subdirectory but different: {.Title! Or want to share it with the appropriate `` front matter will processed! Html files are rendered on your computer 3 growing SSG helpers using Jekyll plugins if you need the of. Generating blogs our newsletter to get Hugo to generate 600k pages in subdirectory. Really comes down to the computer hosting the HTTP server and is commonly used for generating blogs the DEV Power... These can be run on GitHub ) that you have a Ruby environment is a blog! Is now developed by Bjørn Erik Pedersen HTML file is generated from the command Line Interface ), themes. Rich CMS backend for your project and reload the browser for you starting... 'S adjust our expectations accordingly: //docs.mendix.com, where we have the tools for editors to manage content! Start understanding the pros and cons of Hugo and Jekyll give you the ability to them... Into Go template, the template and content architecture to start understanding the pros and cons of Hugo custom. To optimize it for production Line Interface ), installing themes from the Hugo import Jekyll [ jekyll_path ] hugo_path!, we published a breakdown of how Hugo and Jekyll perform on what i need customizing your site to., GitHub 's co-founder, it is written in Go Copy '' button with...